<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 the most secure OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.win7connect.com/news/windows-7-the-most-secure-os.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.win7connect.com/news/windows-7-the-most-secure-os.html</link>
	<description>win7connect - A website dedicated to Microsoft Windows 7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FalconFour</title>
		<link>http://www.win7connect.com/news/windows-7-the-most-secure-os.html/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>FalconFour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.win7connect.com/?p=70#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Every version of Windows is more &quot;secure&quot; than the last, but the painful truth is that the more so-called &quot;security&quot; you add, the more user inconvenience you add as well. UAC is a prime example of that. The more you try to confirm every action, the more users will just learn to click &quot;yes&quot; to everything. Windows XP is the most secure OS in my opinion, simply because it&#039;s so straightforward and easy to keep tabs on. Vista (and hence Win7) has way too many places to hide things, and a convoluted new system for managing system files, that makes it all too easy to stash a virus in the system. In XP, everything is transparent and understandable, and easy to maintain. Win7 did a bit to help make things more transparent and easier to manage, but it&#039;s still a bit Vista-clumsy.

And of course MS will say that (insert newest version of Windows) is the most secure/fast/efficient/productive version of Windows ever. They&#039;ve said that since the beginning of Windows (except Win2K, I think, which didn&#039;t have &quot;advertising&quot; banners during Setup). It&#039;s just PR fluff... what the final word comes down to is if it actually holds true in the real world ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every version of Windows is more &#8220;secure&#8221; than the last, but the painful truth is that the more so-called &#8220;security&#8221; you add, the more user inconvenience you add as well. UAC is a prime example of that. The more you try to confirm every action, the more users will just learn to click &#8220;yes&#8221; to everything. Windows XP is the most secure OS in my opinion, simply because it&#8217;s so straightforward and easy to keep tabs on. Vista (and hence Win7) has way too many places to hide things, and a convoluted new system for managing system files, that makes it all too easy to stash a virus in the system. In XP, everything is transparent and understandable, and easy to maintain. Win7 did a bit to help make things more transparent and easier to manage, but it&#8217;s still a bit Vista-clumsy.</p>
<p>And of course MS will say that (insert newest version of Windows) is the most secure/fast/efficient/productive version of Windows ever. They&#8217;ve said that since the beginning of Windows (except Win2K, I think, which didn&#8217;t have &#8220;advertising&#8221; banners during Setup). It&#8217;s just PR fluff&#8230; what the final word comes down to is if it actually holds true in the real world <img src='http://www.win7connect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

