Posts Tagged ‘Windows 7 security’

Security Hole Found In Windows 7?

According to Chinese researchers at 360 security, a security hole has been discovered in Windows 7.  This is described as the first zero-day vulnerability discovered in windows 7.  Microsoft however has not issued a statement either confirming or denying this find, so this story could be proven wrong.  Their is not much information available about the security hole, except that it is able to create blue screens when opening or closing windows due to incompatibility with old code from windows 3.1

The graphical interfaces system of Windows 7 RC contains old codes from Windows 3.1 where security is not considered when developed. When Microsoft optimizes the graphical interfaces of Windows 7, the incompatibility with old codes leads the system to blue screen.

Attackers will be able to firstly invade the System server of certain object to launch the attack, or to make a potential opportunity for a second attack. Thus, the security hole is a greater threat for the firm and government customers who’re using Windows 7 RC.

 

More information can be found here

 

What i’m really wondering is.. must we still deal with windows 3.1 code.. can’t we put it behind us?

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: ,

Windows 7 security explained

Paul Cooke has updated the Windows Team Blog website with a great article explaining Windows 7 security and Windows 7 Mobile security, Paul article is a great read and i recommend you have a read if you want a better understanding of just how far the Windows 7 dev team have gone to ensure that Windows 7 is the most secure OS to date.

Some of the topics Paul covers include:

  • Windows 7 Multiple Active Firewall Policies
  • Windows 7 DirectAccess (VPN of the future)
  • Windows 7 BranchCache
  • Windows 7 BitLocker To Go
  • Windows 7 AppLocker

You can read the full article here: READ HERE

VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rating: 6.8/10 (5 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.9_1023]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: